T4K3.news
Joey Barton to pay Jeremy Vine over £200k after defamation case
Joey Barton will pay significant legal costs to Jeremy Vine following a libel ruling.

Joey Barton will pay Jeremy Vine significant legal costs after a libel case regarding false allegations.
Joey Barton ordered to pay over £200k to Jeremy Vine for defamation
Joey Barton, the former England footballer, has been ordered to pay over £200,000 in legal costs to BBC presenter Jeremy Vine following a libel case. The High Court ruled that Barton had defamed Vine by calling him a “big bike nonce” and a “pedo defender” on social media. Barton had already agreed to pay £110,000 in damages and made two apologies last year. In total, Barton's payments now amount to £203,172.30, including £160,000 in legal costs for Vine. Vine’s legal representation emphasized the distress caused by Barton's online campaign and highlighted his lack of cooperation during negotiations.
Key Takeaways
"Barton made a calculated and sustained attack against Vine."
This highlights the seriousness of Barton's online behavior and the court's perspective on it.
"The broadcaster was deeply alarmed, distressed and upset by Barton's actions."
This emphasizes the emotional toll of defamation in public discourse.
This case underlines the serious repercussions of online defamation. Barton’s comments were not just careless; they were part of a broader, damaging narrative against Vine. The large financial penalty serves as a warning to public figures about the dangers of making false allegations online. Vine's insistence on accountability also reflects a cultural shift where victims are increasingly willing to take a stand against defamation and harassment. The nature of modern communication demands responsibility, and Barton's case is a stark reminder of this.
Highlights
- Accountability in the digital age is non-negotiable.
- False allegations online can have steep consequences.
- Public figures are not above the law when it comes to defamation.
- The price of careless words can be very high.
High cost of online defamation
The case illustrates the severe financial and reputational risks associated with online defamation in public life.
As online statements gain far-reaching impact, the importance of accountability becomes ever clearer.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Trump files libel lawsuit against Wall Street Journal

Macron couple files lawsuit against Candace Owens

Noel Gallagher confronts fans at London concert

Mo Gilligan criticized as deadbeat dad

Jason Manford cancels performance due to health issues

Macron couple sues Candace Owens for defamation

Trump sues Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal

Jeremy Renner's Role in The Unusuals Highlights His Range
