T4K3.news
Hostage review critique
A measured take on Netflix’s London thriller highlighting talent and tight budget

A measured critique of Netflix's Hostage that questions the show's character depth and production constraints.
Hostage review finds talent trapped in a thin script
Hostage is a five part Netflix thriller set in London. It stars Julie Delpy as Vivienne Toussaint, the French president, and Suranne Jones as British prime minister Abigail Dalton. The premise follows a summit crisis and a hostage situation in French Guiana that tests political alliances. The review says the show has a strong premise and two capable leads but the supporting cast is underdeveloped and the production scope feels limited, with minimal sets and a pale sense of danger.
The critic argues the writing relies on roles and status rather than voices, leaving characters as loglines. The ending is described as uninspired and cribbed from other thrillers, which undermines the potential of the setup.
Key Takeaways
"This is a first draft for something that could have been developed and finessed into a series of substance."
Critical take on the show's development and potential
"Delpy, Jones and those curious enough to watch them going head to head deserved better than … whatever this show was called"
Direct critique of the casting and result
"The hostage subplot, which was shot in the Canary Islands, is one or two drone shots of a jungle but nothing to generate excitement or tension or visual variety"
Comment on production and visuals
The piece highlights how the show treats female power as a prop rather than a perspective, offering a gendered exploration that never fully engages with the implications of leadership. It also critiques Netflix for greenlighting prestige thrillers that look good on screen but falter in depth, suggesting more development time could turn a concept into meaningful drama. The review notes that while Delpy and Jones bring authority to their roles, the material fails to give them distinct lines of voice beyond the political theater, a common trap for well mounted but undercooked thrillers.
Overall the analysis points to a promising premise that could be sharpened with tighter scripts, deeper character work, and clearer stakes. If future episodes commit to character driven tension rather than plot machinery, Hostage could become a sharper meditation on power and gender in contemporary politics.
Highlights
- This feels like a first draft that needed more time
- Strong leads deserve a stronger script
- Power is a costume not a voice
- Thrillers need ideas that stick beyond the hostage
Political sensitivity around leaders and hostage plot
The show involves real world political figures and policies which could spark backlash or misinterpretation. Budget and production constraints may affect reception.
A sharper follow up could turn this into a real television moment
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Security adviser opposes Gaza City takeover plan

Hostage review out now

Gaza truce plan reaches Cairo

Spike Lee critique prompts lively discussion

Antisemitic assault at Frankfurt hostage vigil

Curtis defends Freakier Friday after harsh review

Review of Jurassic Park Reissued for New Generation

Phelps calls for independent review of USA Swimming
