favicon

T4K3.news

Hostage review critique

A measured take on Netflix’s London thriller highlighting talent and tight budget

August 21, 2025 at 07:01 AM
blur Julie Delpy and Suranne Jones in Netflix Drama

A measured critique of Netflix's Hostage that questions the show's character depth and production constraints.

Hostage review finds talent trapped in a thin script

Hostage is a five part Netflix thriller set in London. It stars Julie Delpy as Vivienne Toussaint, the French president, and Suranne Jones as British prime minister Abigail Dalton. The premise follows a summit crisis and a hostage situation in French Guiana that tests political alliances. The review says the show has a strong premise and two capable leads but the supporting cast is underdeveloped and the production scope feels limited, with minimal sets and a pale sense of danger.

The critic argues the writing relies on roles and status rather than voices, leaving characters as loglines. The ending is described as uninspired and cribbed from other thrillers, which undermines the potential of the setup.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Strong performances cannot save a thin script
✔️
Leaders are defined by roles rather than voices
✔️
Production budget limits show in visuals and scope
✔️
Premise lacks a clear political stance or unique point of view
✔️
More development time could unlock deeper themes
✔️
Supporting characters feel like loglines not people
✔️
Ending feels predictable and borrowed from other thrillers
✔️
The show has potential if it shifts from plot to character driven tension

"This is a first draft for something that could have been developed and finessed into a series of substance."

Critical take on the show's development and potential

"Delpy, Jones and those curious enough to watch them going head to head deserved better than … whatever this show was called"

Direct critique of the casting and result

"The hostage subplot, which was shot in the Canary Islands, is one or two drone shots of a jungle but nothing to generate excitement or tension or visual variety"

Comment on production and visuals

The piece highlights how the show treats female power as a prop rather than a perspective, offering a gendered exploration that never fully engages with the implications of leadership. It also critiques Netflix for greenlighting prestige thrillers that look good on screen but falter in depth, suggesting more development time could turn a concept into meaningful drama. The review notes that while Delpy and Jones bring authority to their roles, the material fails to give them distinct lines of voice beyond the political theater, a common trap for well mounted but undercooked thrillers.

Overall the analysis points to a promising premise that could be sharpened with tighter scripts, deeper character work, and clearer stakes. If future episodes commit to character driven tension rather than plot machinery, Hostage could become a sharper meditation on power and gender in contemporary politics.

Highlights

  • This feels like a first draft that needed more time
  • Strong leads deserve a stronger script
  • Power is a costume not a voice
  • Thrillers need ideas that stick beyond the hostage

Political sensitivity around leaders and hostage plot

The show involves real world political figures and policies which could spark backlash or misinterpretation. Budget and production constraints may affect reception.

A sharper follow up could turn this into a real television moment

🏷️
hostagenetflixlondonjulie-delpysuranne-jones televisionmedia]]descriptionA measured critique of Netflix's Hostage that questions the show's character depth and production constraints.main_contentHostage is a five part Netflix thriller set in London. It stars Julie Delpy as Vivienne Toussaint, the French president, and Suranne Jones as British prime minister Abigail Dalton. The premise follows a summit crisis and a hostage situation in French Guiana that tests political alliances. The review says the show has a strong premise and two capable leads but the supporting cast is underdeveloped and the production scope feels limited, with minimal sets and a pale sense of danger. The critic argues the writing relies on roles and status rather than voices, leaving characters as loglines. The ending is described as uninspired and cribbed from other thrillers, which undermines the potential of the setup.analysis_paragraphThe piece highlights how the show treats female power as a prop rather than a perspective, offering a gendered exploration that never fully engages with the implications of leadership. It also critiques Netflix for greenlighting prestige thrillers that look good on screen but falter in depth, suggesting more development time could turn a concept into meaningful drama. The review notes that while Delpy and Jones bring authority to their roles, the material fails to give them distinct lines of voice beyond the political theater, a common trap for well mounted but undercooked thrillers. Overall the analysis points to a promising premise that could be sharpened with tighter scripts, deeper character work, and clearer stakes. If future episodes commit to character driven tension rather than plot machinery, Hostage could become a sharper meditation on power and gender in contemporary politics.key_takeawaysStrong performances cannot save a thin scriptLeaders are defined by roles rather than voicesProduction budget limits show in visuals and scopePremise lacks a clear political stance or unique point of viewMore development time could unlock deeper themesSupporting characters feel like loglines not peopleEnding feels predictable and borrowed from other thrillersThe show has potential if it shifts from plot to character driven tensionaudience impact 4 4quote_candidatesThis feels like a first draft that needed more timeStrong leads deserve a stronger scriptPower is a costume not a voiceThrillers need ideas that stick beyond the hostagequotes{"text":"This is a first draft for something that could have been developed and finessed into a series of substance.","context":"Critical take on the show's development and potential","type":"factual"},{"text":"Delpy, Jones and those curious enough to watch them going head to head deserved better than … whatever this show was called","context":"Direct critique of the casting and result","type":"opinion"},{"text":"The hostage subplot, which was shot in the Canary Islands, is one or two drone shots of a jungle but nothing to generate excitement or tension or visual variety","context":"Comment on production and visuals","type":"emotional"}],moodskepticalaudience_impact["netflix subscribers","political thriller fans","fans of julie delpy","fans of suranne jones","uk viewers"]footerA sharper follow up could turn this into a real television momenttags["hostage","netflix","london","julie-delpy","suranne-jones"]languageenreading_time120risk_flag{"title":"Political sensitivity around leaders and hostage plot","body":"The show involves real world political figures and policies which could spark backlash or misinterpretation. Budget and production constraints may affect reception.","flags":["political","public reaction","controversy","budget","investors","sensitive"]}notification{ }

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News