T4K3.news
Hackett questions VAR ruling on Trafford red card
Former referee Keith Hackett says the decision was a clear DOGSO and outside-the-box handball, urging VAR clarity after Tottenham’s win.

A Tottenham win at the Etihad prompts a fresh debate over a potential red card for James Trafford and VAR's role.
Hackett questions VAR ruling on James Trafford red card in City defeat
Tottenham Hotspur stunned Manchester City 2-0 at the Etihad after a key moment involving James Trafford. The City goalkeeper charged out of his box in the 39th minute and clashed with Mohammed Kudus, with a handball claim and a potential denial of an obvious goalscoring opportunity at stake. A VAR review did not overturn the decision, leaving City to navigate the rest of the match with a reduced margin for error. Joao Palhinha bundled home a rebound later in the first half to seal Spurs’ lead.
Keith Hackett, the former PGMOL chief, told Football Insider that Trafford’s actions constituted a red card for DOGSO and a handball offence outside the area, a view that sparked immediate online and stadium debate as City supporters called for greater consistency from refereeing officials. Trafford finished the match having faced pressure but avoided dismissal, contributing to a narrative about VAR’s reach and limits in high-stakes games.
Key Takeaways
"This is a clear handball offence outside the penalty area."
Hackett's assessment of the incident.
"It’s a denial of an obvious goalscoring opportunity. It’s a red card."
Hackett outlining the DOGSO decision.
"What is VAR doing?"
Hackett questioning the VAR process during the incident.
"Consistency in officiating is the real measure of VAR."
Editorial takeaway about the broader issue.
The episode highlights ongoing questions about how DOGSO and handball rules are applied when the offence occurs outside the box. VAR’s role in such moments remains contentious, dragging officials into post-match scrutiny and prompting speculation about how future rulings will be standardized across leagues. For Trafford, the incident underscores the heavy toll on young keepers when one decision can alter a career narrative, even as the team recovers in late-season pressure. Beyond this single game, the incident feeds a broader conversation about transparency, consistency, and the practical challenges referees face in fast-moving matches where every second counts.
Highlights
- VAR needs to keep pace with the game it aims to protect
- Consistency is the real edge in officiating
- Clear rules mean fewer debates after full time
- Young keepers learn under pressure not panic
Officiating controversy and public reaction
The incident has sparked debate about VAR consistency and the handling of serious offences outside the box, risking reputational harm to officials and governing bodies if scrutiny continues without clear reform.
Fair play is earned when rules and refereeing live up to the game’s pace and pressure.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

VAR review prompts calls for clearer rules

VAR decision sparks backlash

VAR controversy hits Prem opener

Rangers draw Dundee after late Tavernier penalty

Liverpool officiating debate continues

Chelsea held by Palace in opening day

Rangers draw with Dundee as mentality questions linger

Premier League season kicks off with new rules and big signings
