T4K3.news

Fraudulent meat operation leads to prison sentences in Wales

Helim Miah and Noaf Rahman sold expired chicken and mislabelled halal meat to restaurants.

July 25, 2025 at 02:00 PM

Out-of-date chicken and meat that wasn't what it seemed sold to restaurants across Wales

A disturbing case highlights severe food safety violations linked to a fraudulent meat operation.

Investors face risks as fraudulent meat operation revealed in Wales

An investigation uncovered that Helim Miah and Noaf Rahman sold expired chicken and mislabelled non-halal meat as halal to restaurants in south Wales. Miah has been sentenced to over four years in prison for charges including running a dishonest food business and violating hygiene standards. In addition to the fraudulent labeling, the investigation revealed hazardous conditions involving unsanitary transportation methods and meat stored well past its sell-by date. Rahman received a 24-month suspended sentence after pleading guilty to multiple food hygiene offences.

Key Takeaways

✔️

Helim Miah sentenced to over four years in prison for food fraud.

✔️

Co-defendant Noaf Rahman received a two-year suspended sentence.

✔️

Investigation revealed meat two years past sell-by dates.

✔️

Unsanitary conditions included unclean vehicles used for transport.

✔️

Public health is at risk due to fraudulent meat distribution.

✔️

Calls for stronger regulations on halal food certifications.

"This story will be deeply concerning to our Muslim community."

Councillor Norma Mackie highlights the impact on the Muslim community who rely on halal food.

"Eating halal is a requirement in the Islamic religion."

Councillor Mackie emphasizes the significance of halal compliance for consumers.

"The investigation revealed extremely poor food hygiene conditions."

Miah's operation showcased significant lapses in food safety and hygiene practices.

"This case raises important questions about how food suppliers are held accountable."

Councillor Mackie calls for greater accountability in food safety regulations.

This case uncovers significant flaws in food safety practices, raising alarms about how such fraudulent operations can thrive unmonitored. It reflects a critical gap in accountability regarding halal certification standards, potentially misleading those who rely on these labels for dietary compliance. The need for stringent regulatory reform in food safety and transparency is immediate, especially for vulnerable communities that trust the supply chain to meet their religious and health needs. The repercussions for consumers may extend beyond just food safety to public trust in the halal certification system.