favicon

T4K3.news

Farage pushes Reform peers into the House of Lords

Nigel Farage calls for Reform UK life peers in the Lords; defence secretary criticizes the move.

August 15, 2025 at 08:12 AM
blur Farage urges Starmer to appoint Reform peers to House of Lords

Nigel Farage asks Keir Starmer to allow Reform UK life peers in the Lords, drawing sharp rebuttal from a defence secretary.

Farage pushes Reform peers into the House of Lords

Nigel Farage has written to Labour leader Keir Starmer asking that Reform UK be allowed to nominate life peers to the House of Lords. He argues there is a democratic disparity because smaller parties have peers while Reform UK does not, despite winning a large share of votes in the last general election. He says Reform UK should be represented in the upper chamber as soon as possible.

Defence Secretary John Healey rejected the idea on LBC, saying parliament would not benefit from more Putin apologists. He noted that peer appointments are usually at the prime minister’s discretion and that Starmer’s Labour government has not committed to a quick path to reform. The piece also points out that Labour has flirted with broader reform ideas, while reform proposals include replacing the Lords with an elected second chamber.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Farage seeks Reform UK peers in the Lords to address a perceived democratic gap
✔️
Healey frames the proposal as a perilous move that could appoint “Putin apologists” to Parliament
✔️
Appointments to the Lords remain a discretionary prerogative of the prime minister
✔️
Labour has floated reforms but has not committed to a fully elected upper chamber
✔️
The debate ties reform rhetoric to electoral performance and party strategy
✔️
The episode illustrates the inherent tension between tradition and democratic accountability in the Lords

"I'm not sure that parliament's going to benefit from more Putin apologists like Nigel Farage, to be honest."

Healey's criticism on LBC

"Reform UK wishes to appoint life peers to the upper house at the earliest possible opportunity."

Farage's letter

"Sir Keir could respond by going for a fully elected upper house"

Natalie Bennett's perspective

"None of this holds water any longer, given the seismic shifts that have taken place in British politics."

Farage's claim

The move spots a fault line in post-Brexit British politics. It shows how party strategy can hinge on the symbolism of the Lords as much as on policy. Reform UK wants a seat at the table to push its brand of constitutional reform, while Labour weighs its own promises of change against the reality of parliamentary consent. The clash also raises questions about where legitimacy in the upper house should come from: votes, votes plus mandates, or inherited prestige.

Beyond the personalities, the episode underscores a wider debate about the purpose of the Lords. Labour has signalled a willingness to reform, yet the party has avoided a concrete commitment to a fully elected chamber. Farage’s bid highlights how quickly constitutional questions move from theory to political theater, and how messy reform battles can become when they touch electoral credibility and coalition dynamics.

Highlights

  • Democracy must reflect voters not the old guard
  • A seat in the Lords should follow a mandate not a letter
  • Change is a test of political nerve not a ceremonial gesture
  • This row shows how reform promises meet the reality of power

Political risk around Lords reform

The push to appoint Reform UK peers and the broader Lords reform debate carry political risk for Labour and Reform UK. Critics may see it as a partisan maneuver that could provoke backlash and complicate policy goals.

The Lords reform debate continues to unfold as parties test how far constitutional change will ride on election momentum.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News