Ex-CIA officer disputes Gabbard on Russian interference

Susan Miller challenges assertions by Tulsi Gabbard and the White House regarding the 2016 election.

Ex-CIA officer condemns Gabbard and White House claims about Russian election interference

Susan Miller, a former CIA officer, criticized Tulsi Gabbard and the White House for their claims about Russian interference in the 2016 election. Miller, who was involved in the 2017 intelligence assessment, stated that the report indicated Russia's goal was to support Donald Trump, but there was no evidence of collaboration between Trump and Russia. Gabbard previously claimed that the assessment was based on false information aimed at undermining Trump. Miller's comments highlight the ongoing political divides regarding Russia's role in the election, as disagreements continue over the validity of intelligence reports. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence dismissed Miller's statements, insisting their position is clear and well documented in previously declassified reports.

This dispute illustrates a deeply entrenched political divide. Miller's defense of the intelligence community is set against Gabbard's narrative, which claims malfeasance within the intelligence apparatus. This conflict could reinforce partisan perceptions, potentially complicating public understanding of both the facts and implications surrounding election interference. Moreover, with ongoing deeper investigations and allegations, trust in intelligence assessments may continue to erode, empowering narratives that serve partisan interests rather than the truth.

Highlights

As this story unfolds, the implications for public trust in intelligence will remain significant.