T4K3.news

EU initiative facing complaint linked to funding disclosure

The Stop Destroying Videogames initiative has received a transparency complaint from the European Commission.

July 22, 2025 at 12:48 PM

Campaign asking EU to stop publishers "destroying" online games hit by anonymous transparency complaint

A complaint about an EU citizens' initiative aims to impact online gaming support.

EU initiative faces transparency complaint amid gaming support concerns

The Stop Destroying Videogames initiative, part of the Stop Killing Games campaign, has faced a transparency complaint. Ross Scott, a prominent YouTuber and spokesperson for the campaign, shared this news in a recent video, stating that the complaint was relayed by the European Commission. The initiative, which has gathered 1.4 million signatures, seeks to ensure that game publishers provide solid plans for when their online games go offline. The complaint alleges that the initiative's organizers submitted misleading information about funding sources. Specifically, it claims they did not declare certain contributions involving Scott's extensive volunteer work, which the complaint estimates could be valued at €63,000-147,000. Scott refuted these claims, explaining his role is strictly voluntary and he is not officially listed among the initiative's organizers. The document refers to his significant involvement as evidence of a financial contribution that should have been reported. The EU's response process indicates there is no immediate risk to the initiative while they investigate the claim, allowing for a full examination of the allegations before consequences are determined.

Key Takeaways

✔️

The Stop Destroying Videogames initiative has gathered significant public support with 1.4 million signatures.

✔️

A transparency complaint filed questions the funding declarations related to the initiative.

✔️

Ross Scott's involvement is at the center of the complaint, despite his claims of volunteer status.

✔️

Anonymous complaints are standard in EU protocols but raise questions about transparency.

✔️

The EU's process allows accused initiatives to respond before any punitive actions are taken.

✔️

Public backing remains crucial for grassroots campaigns like this one to thrive.

"This complaint represents someone trying to kill the initiative."

Scott suggests the complaint is a tactic by opponents of the initiative.

"I have no actual authority over this initiative."

Scott clarifies his role in the initiative amid the transparency complaint.

This situation highlights the tension between grassroots movements and established industry players. The complaint against the Stop Destroying Videogames initiative underscores the scrutiny that passionate advocates face when they challenge powerful interests. Ross Scott's response points to a common narrative in advocacy: the idea that those who speak out are often silenced or attacked through bureaucratic channels. If these types of challenges become commonplace, they could hinder citizen initiatives that aim to protect consumer rights in the gaming industry. The future of this campaign may depend not just on the validity of the complaint but on the public's support and engagement with the issues at stake.

Highlights

Grassroots advocates often face scrutiny that can silence their voices.
The gaming community demands accountability from publishers.
Complaints like these challenge the integrity of citizen initiatives.
Transparency should empower, not hinder, movements for change.

Transparency complaint raises concerns for gaming initiative

The complaint questions the funding declarations and contributions related to the initiative, prompting scrutiny of its operation and the potential impact on public support.

As the investigation unfolds, the gaming community watches closely for the outcome and its implications.

🏷️

games campaign EU transparency advocacy gaming politics technology

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!