T4K3.news
Couple sues Waitrose for race discrimination
Peter Hedger and Katerina Dimitrova claim they faced discrimination after being dismissed for unauthorized leave.

Peter Hedger and Katerina Dimitrova are taking legal action against Waitrose after being sacked for an unauthorized trip.
Couple sues Waitrose claiming discrimination after dismissal for unauthorized holiday
Peter Hedger and Katerina Dimitrova have filed a lawsuit against Waitrose, claiming they were discriminated against on racial grounds after their dismissal. The couple went on an unauthorized holiday to Bulgaria, returning with notable tans. However, an employment tribunal ruled their sacking was due to gross misconduct linked to their absence. The tribunal found that they had not communicated their absence properly and had misled management about the reason for their time off. Judge Naeema Choudry stated that the couple's case for discrimination based on their appearance and nationality lacked merit and was dismissed.
Key Takeaways
"The reason for dismissal was not due to the couple being in Bulgaria but because they were believed to be absent from work for no good reason."
This statement clarifies the tribunal's stance on the dismissal.
"Unauthorised absence was listed as an example of gross misconduct in John Lewis's handbook."
This highlights the employer's framework for dismissals related to absence.
"It is clear that the couple were dismissed because they were perceived to be on holiday when they were supposed to be at work."
This reflects the tribunal's conclusion regarding the couple's absence.
"Claims based on Ms Dimitrova's Bulgarian nationality have no reasonable prospects of success."
This indicates the tribunal's dismissal of racial discrimination claims.
This case raises important questions about workplace norms and how they intersect with personal decisions. While the couple claims racial discrimination, the tribunal's findings suggest that their communications about their absences were a more significant factor in their dismissal. It illustrates the complexities employees face when dealing with workplace rules versus personal choices. Moreover, the ruling could signal to other employers about the necessity of clear communication regarding leave and disciplinary actions.
Highlights
- Unauthorized absence is a serious breach of workplace trust.
- Discrimination claims need solid evidence to succeed in court.
- Communication gaps can lead to significant professional fallout.
- Personal choices should be clearly communicated in professional settings.
Potential backlash over perceived racial discrimination
The case could invite public and media scrutiny regarding race and employment policies, affecting both Waitrose and similar retailers.
This case reflects ongoing tensions in employment law concerning personal freedoms.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Tyrese Gibson sues The Home Depot for over $1m

Jessica Mulroney expresses regrets about Meghan Markle
Tony Buzbee addresses accusations of targeting Black men

Marvel's The Fantastic Four now in theaters

Trump freezes $200 million in UCLA funding over antisemitism claims
Brad Keselowski seeks playoff spot in Iowa race

Biden's Title IX changes face legal challenges
