favicon

T4K3.news

Costner faces lawsuit over unscripted rape scene

A stunt performer alleges an unscripted, violent rape scene was directed without proper notice or an intimacy coordinator, while Costner contests the claim and seeks dismissal.

August 19, 2025 at 09:07 PM
blur Kevin Costner calls lawsuit over on-set rape scene a ‘bold-faced lie’

A stunt performer accuses Kevin Costner of forcing an unscripted violent rape scene on Horizon Chapter 2, while Costner and his team push back with anti-SLAPP claims.

Costner fights lawsuit over alleged unscripted rape scene

A lawsuit filed in LA Superior Court accuses Kevin Costner of forcing a violent, unscripted rape scene on a member of Horizon: An American Saga Chapter 2. Lead stunt double Devyn LaBella says she was summoned to set without notice or consent and without an intimacy coordinator, after a scripted scene had already been filmed with a different character. The claim states that a male actor mounted LaBella, who alleges the scene violated union protocols requiring 48 hours notice and consent for nudity or simulated sex. An amendment by Celeste Chaney, an intimacy coordinator, supports LaBella’s account, calling it an unscheduled and unplanned violent scene and noting inadequate wardrobe protection.

Costner’s legal filing labels the allegations a “bold-faced lie” and argues the suit is designed to damage his reputation. The defense cites testimony from crew members, photographs, and LaBella’s own words as proof the incident was fictional and the suit opportunistic. The case also touches on the film’s production history, including Horizon’s high budget and the status of Chapter 2, which premiered at the Venice Film Festival but has not announced a general release date.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Allegations focus on a violation of union safety rules and lack of intimacy coordination
✔️
Costner rejects the claims and seeks to dismiss the case under anti-SLAPP laws
✔️
The dispute highlights on-set safety norms and the role of intimacy coordinators
✔️
Horizon Chapter 2's release plans remain unclear while legal issues loom
✔️
Financial and reputational risks could affect the project’s funding and reception
✔️
The case may influence industry practices around consent and protected work environments
✔️
Public response to the dispute could impact future collaborations and box office prospects

"There was no anger or resentment, only enthusiasm and gratitude."

Quoted in Costner’s filing describing a message LaBella allegedly sent after the incident.

"LaBella’s opportunistic and salacious lawsuit is just as fictional as the motion picture."

Part of Costner’s legal filing arguing the suit is false.

"The scene was build-up and foretelling of two violent rapes that occur off-screen."

Costner’s characterization of the incident in the filing.

The debate centers on set safety, power on big productions, and how unions police protections for performers. If proven, the case could push studios to tighten safeguards and strengthen oversight of intimate scenes. The anti-SLAPP strategy signals a broader trend where high-profile figures defend reputations with legal leverage, potentially chilling other performers from speaking out. The dispute also tests how audiences respond to behind-the-scenes conflict when a passion project becomes a public fight over responsibility and safety.

Highlights

  • On set safety cannot be a sideshow
  • Power in Hollywood should not shield abuse
  • A contract is not a shield for cruelty
  • Consent on set is non negotiable

On set safety and harassment allegations risk

The dispute hinges on on-set safety protocols, consent, and anti-SLAPP protections. A high-profile case with budget implications and public attention could influence investor confidence and policy shifts in the industry.

The industry watches how safety norms evolve as big-budget cinema pushes into new storytelling grounds.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News