Celebrity feud on social media continues

A public custody dispute between Peter Andre and Katie Price escalates as both sides accuse the other of lies on Instagram and in a podcast.

Peter Andre and Katie Price feud erupts on social media

Peter Andre posted a furious statement on Instagram accusing his ex wife Katie Price of lies, saying there are important facts about their children that must be made public. He claims Princess and Junior came into his care in 2018 and that a 2019 family court order enforced this arrangement, saying he had kept details private out of respect for the children.

He also references past court cases from 2011 and 2015 in which Katie Price was ordered to pay damages and apologize, arguing those false claims are being repeated today. He signals that more responses will follow in the months ahead as he addresses what he calls ongoing falsehoods about his children’s welfare.

Katie Price responded on her podcast, saying she wants to be involved in her children’s lives and that there should be space for both parents to support their kids. She described herself as a devoted mother and pushed back against what she sees as being unfairly kept from Princess and Junior, while noting she was previously restricted from appearing in Princess’s ITV2 show.

The dispute centers on parenting arrangements and public perception, with each side using social media and podcast platforms to present their version of events.

This feud follows a familiar pattern in celebrity families, where private disputes become public drama through social posts and media interviews. The timing matters: the posts arrive after Katie’s podcast remarks and amid ongoing public interest in their children. The exchange risks turning private parenting decisions into a public spectacle, potentially affecting Princess and Junior before legal clarity or court orders are re-examined. The episode also highlights how audiences and tabloids can amplify personal disputes, shaping sympathy and judgment before the facts are fully aired.

Beyond the personalities involved, the case invites questions about privacy, accountability, and the appropriate boundaries for public figures discussing family matters. As custody conversations move online, the public may read signals about stability, safety, and parental involvement that later prove misleading or incomplete. The coming months will test how much the public should weigh in when the core issues are legal and deeply personal.

Highlights

Public scrutiny will likely continue to shape how this dispute unfolds.