favicon

T4K3.news

BLS nominee suggests pausing monthly jobs data

A new nomination raises the possibility of pausing the monthly jobs report in favor of revised quarterly data, signaling a key test for data credibility and policy impact.

August 12, 2025 at 03:53 PM
blur Trump’s pick for BLS commissioner suggests suspending the monthly jobs report

A nomination for the BLS commissioner proposes pausing the monthly jobs report in favor of revised quarterly data, sparking questions about data credibility and policy implications.

BLS nominee pushes to pause monthly jobs report

EJ Antoni, nominated by President Trump to become the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, has called for pausing the monthly jobs report until revisions can ensure greater accuracy. In an interview with Fox Business conducted before his nomination, he proposed that the BLS publish quarterly data after revisions, arguing that major decision makers from Wall Street to Washington rely on these numbers and that a lack of confidence in the data has far reaching consequences.

The article lays out the context, noting that recent revisions to May and June data were large. May’s total was revised down to 19 000 from 139 000, a 120 000 revision. June’s total was revised to 14 000 from 147 000, a 133 000 revision. It also explains how the BLS collects data and conducts annual benchmark revisions using the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, and it emphasizes that monthly figures are not final even after revisions and that revisions are a normal part of measuring the job market.

Key Takeaways

✔️
A BLS commissioner nominee questions monthly data credibility
✔️
Pause could shift reliance to quarterly revisions
✔️
Large revisions post pandemic are now common but controversial
✔️
Data methods and sample design are central to trust in the numbers
✔️
Political considerations may influence data release practices
✔️
Market participants want timely and accurate information
✔️
Policy debates will hinge on how revisions are communicated
✔️
Revisions often reflect new information and broader economic shifts

"Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data."

Antoni argues for pausing monthly releases until accuracy improves.

"Major decision-makers from Wall Street to D.C. rely on these numbers, and a lack of confidence in the data has far-reaching consequences."

Why the issue matters for policy and markets.

"I disagree with Trump, saying he doesn’t believe the BLS intentionally manipulated the jobs data."

Antoni’s stance on manipulation.

"Revisions to monthly jobs reports have been significantly larger since the pandemic."

Notes the trend in revisions.

The proposal highlights a conflict between precision and timeliness. If adopted, it could slow the release cycle and shift trust from a monthly snapshot to a less frequent reference point. The conversation also exposes how data integrity is a political issue when it intersects with policy momentum and public perception. In the long run, credibility will hinge on transparent methodology and clear communication about revisions rather than headlines that paint a definitive picture of the labor market.

Highlights

  • Data accuracy beats headline speed
  • Timely numbers deserve guardrails
  • Politics should not rewrite the job market
  • Better data than confident headlines

Political and data integrity concerns

The push to suspend or delay monthly data can trigger political backlash and raise questions about data integrity and independence of the BLS. It intersects with budgetary debates and regulatory policy ahead of potential reforms.

The data debate will shape how the public understands the job market for years to come.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News