T4K3.news
Blake Lively accuses Justin Baldoni's team of courtroom tactics
Lively's lawyers claim Baldoni's team seeks to misuse her deposition transcript for public narrative.

Blake Lively's legal team claims Justin Baldoni seeks to misuse her deposition for public narrative.
Blake Lively's Lawyers Accuse Justin Baldoni of Courtroom Abuse
Blake Lively's lawyers filed a motion on August 4, accusing Justin Baldoni's legal team of improperly attempting to release her 292-page deposition transcript. The motion states that Baldoni’s team allegedly submitted the unreviewed draft to the public record without justification, arguing it's designed to smear Lively's character amid their ongoing legal battle related to the film It Ends With Us. The actress's attorneys emphasized that Lively desires a transparent legal process but expressed concerns over the motives behind the release, stating it undermines her credibility in the eyes of potential jurors.
Key Takeaways
"There is no conceivable legal purpose to file the whole transcript."
This quote reflects the attorneys' argument regarding misuse of sensitive materials.
"This narrative blaming Ms. Lively is part of an ongoing character attack."
Lively's lawyers emphasize the damaging impact of Baldoni's legal strategies.
"To suggest otherwise is part of an ongoing character attack."
This highlights the attorneys' fight against perceived public maligning due to courtroom tactics.
"Ms. Lively affirmatively pursued this litigation with the full intention to be heard."
Here, Lively's lawyers assert her commitment to the legal process despite allegations.
This legal conflict highlights important issues within the realm of celebrity litigation. Lively's strong stance against the release of her transcript suggests an effort to maintain control over her narrative amidst a backdrop of potential media manipulation. The reported tactics of Baldoni's team, if true, reflect a concerning trend where legal documents may be weaponized for PR strategies rather than serving their original legal purposes. As this case progresses, the implications for public perception and the integrity of legal proceedings become increasingly critical.
Highlights
- This tactic is a manufactured excuse to force the transcript into the public domain.
- The public filing undermines the rules of evidence established for this case.
- Baldoni’s presence was a calculated move, not just a legal tactic.
- The suggestion that Lively is fearful is entirely untrue.
Concerns over legal strategy and public perception
The ongoing legal battle raises concerns about the use of sensitive court documents to influence public opinion. This could lead to significant backlash against Baldoni if deemed a manipulation tactic.
The ongoing proceedings will likely reveal more about the use of legal documents in public narratives.
Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!
Related News

Blake Lively criticizes Justin Baldoni's legal team for deposition tactics

Blake Lively testifies against Justin Baldoni in court

Blake Lively faces deposition against Justin Baldoni

Blake Lively’s deposition turns contentious with surprise attendance

Judge dismisses Jed Wallace from Lively's lawsuit

Taylor Swift performs unexpectedly at concert in Nashville

Krafton sued for allegedly sabotaging Subnautica 2's release

Fort Stewart Shooting Suspect Identified
