favicon

T4K3.news

BA flight attendant wins discrimination case

A veteran BA employee wins a discrimination ruling after being dismissed due to anxiety and depression developed during the pandemic.

August 13, 2025 at 10:04 AM
blur BA flight attendant sacked for being too anxious to fly wins discrimination case

A veteran BA flight attendant wins a discrimination case after being dismissed for not flying due to anxiety and depression developed during the pandemic.

BA flight attendant sacked for being too anxious to fly wins discrimination case

Jennifer Clifford served BA for nearly four decades before her dispute with the carrier. During the pandemic she was furloughed and later moved to ground duties. By late 2022 she remained unable to fly because of anxiety and depression and the tribunal heard she was ultimately dismissed. The judge found that BA should have explored a phased ground-based return or redeployment instead of immediate dismissal.

The trial also noted a comment by a BA manager that Clifford had only a minor anxiety problem, a remark that was seen as minimizing her disability. Clifford left the company in December 2022 after the plan to stay on ground duties did not materialize into a sustainable path back to flying. The tribunal upheld her disability discrimination claim while rejecting the sex discrimination allegation.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Long service does not excuse a lack of accommodation
✔️
Mental health conditions can be protected as disabilities
✔️
Phased returns and redeployment should be standard practice
✔️
Casual or minimising language risks legal consequences
✔️
Ground-based roles can offer a viable path back
✔️
The ruling may push airlines to tighten disability policies
✔️
Sex discrimination claims can be separate from disability rulings

"A reasonable employer would have given her a longer and more suitable phased return"

Tribunal described the appropriate response to her disability

"If you don't like working here, then leave"

Manager described the condition dismissively

"This case shows how language around disability can hurt workers"

Impact of the manager's comment on Clifford's treatment

"Ms Clifford had long service and deserved more flexible options"

Tribunal view on expected accommodation for long-serving staff

The verdict spotlights how large employers handle mental health in demanding roles. It underlines the duty to offer reasonable adjustments and to consider redeployment when flying is not possible. For the aviation sector, the ruling may push HR teams to design clearer phased-return options and to treat long service as an obligation to adapt rather than a shield for rigid schedules. The decision also highlights the power of precise language about health conditions, since casual wording can deepen harm and fuel legal challenges.

Beyond one case, this could influence how workplaces navigate post pandemic backlogs, staff shortages and the pressure to keep operations running while protecting employees who face mental health barriers.

Highlights

  • A longer phased return is the fair path back
  • If you don’t like working here then leave
  • Redeployment can save a career and a business
  • Dignity at work needs real options not excuses

Mental health and discrimination risk

The ruling underscores how mental health conditions are treated in the workplace and could influence future HR practices and legal cases. It also shows how dismissive language about disability can escalate disputes.

The case is a reminder that dignity at work must come with real options, not excuses.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News