favicon

T4K3.news

Arrowhead CEO questions Helldivers 2 community vote results

Shams Jorjani expresses doubt over the winning name choice during a Discord discussion.

July 21, 2025 at 10:08 AM
blur Helldivers 2 dev CEO really doesn’t agree with the community’s vote and teases going against democracy like “Mel Brooks in Spaceballs 2”

Arrowhead CEO expresses disagreement with the Helldivers 2 community vote outcome.

Arrowhead CEO challenges community vote results for Helldivers 2

In a recent discussion on Discord, Shams Jorjani, CEO of Arrowhead, openly criticized the results of a community vote for the name of the City of Remembrance in Helldivers 2. The name 'Gun' won by a notable margin, with 85,188 votes, significantly outpacing the second-place choice, 'Everlasting Memory', which garnered 21,351 votes. Despite the clear popularity of 'Gun', Jorjani expressed skepticism about the name, humorously suggesting a preference for a more 'managed democracy'. He remarked on his own vote for 'Everlasting Memory' and seemed to poke fun at the idea of disregarding player input altogether while reflecting on what he termed 'MANAGED democracy'.

Key Takeaways

✔️
Shams Jorjani disagrees with the community's vote outcome.
✔️
'Gun' won the majority vote in a landslide decision.
✔️
Players expressed strong views on the naming process.
✔️
Jorjani's comments raise questions about developer accountability.
✔️
Balancing player input with creative vision remains challenging.
✔️
The potential for community backlash looms if fans feel sidelined.

"I really hope we go the managed democracy route and pick something else."

Jorjani expressed his hope for a different name despite the community's choice.

"But the people have spoken."

This comment reflects Jorjani's acknowledgment of community feedback despite his disagreement.

"It's MANAGED democracy folks. You don’t honestly think we’re putting you in charge, are you?"

A humorous remark about player involvement in decision-making.

This situation highlights the tension between game developers and player communities. Jorjani's comments may seem like a lighthearted jab, but they speak to a broader issue faced by developers: balancing creative vision with player engagement. A name like 'Gun', while amusing to some, may not resonate with all players and could affect the overall perception of the game. Furthermore, Jorjani's remarks about managed democracy hint at a trend where developers might prioritize their interpretation of what fans want over direct feedback. This could lead to backlash from the community if not addressed carefully.

Highlights

  • When the fans speak, do we really listen?
  • Managed democracy in game naming?
  • Who knew voting could be this absurd?
  • Can humor save Arrowhead from backlash?

Community backlash potential

This situation could lead to negative reactions from the gaming community due to perceived disregard for player votes.

The incident may prompt more reflection on how developers interact with their communities.

Enjoyed this? Let your friends know!

Related News