T4K3.news

Apple initiates lawsuit against Jon Prosser

Jon Prosser faces allegations of accessing Apple trade secrets about iOS 26.

July 18, 2025 at 02:53 PM

Apple has initiated legal action against Jon Prosser for allegedly accessing confidential information about iOS 26.

Apple sues YouTuber Jon Prosser for trade secret theft

Apple is suing Jon Prosser, a well-known leaker and YouTuber, claiming he misappropriated trade secrets regarding iOS 26 and its redesign featuring Liquid Glass. The lawsuit alleges that Prosser and his colleague, Michael Ramacciotti, tapped into private Apple information. This follows Prosser's 2025 leaks which depicted a redesign of iOS 19. Apple asserts that Ramacciotti accessed an Apple development device through a friend, Ethan Lipnik, who has since been fired for not securing the device. Apple seeks an injunction to stop further leaks and is asking for a trial to determine damages.

Key Takeaways

✔️

Apple's legal action points to rising concerns over intellectual property theft.

✔️

Jon Prosser's past leaks now expose him to significant legal risks.

✔️

The case underscores the challenges of safeguarding trade secrets in a digital age.

✔️

Ethan Lipnik's involvement raises questions about internal security at Apple.

✔️

This lawsuit follows another settlement involving trade secret theft earlier this year.

✔️

The outcome could influence how companies manage their confidential information.

"This access and copying was unauthorized and could put Mr Lipnik's career in jeopardy"

Apple details the seriousness of the breach involving Ethan Lipnik.

"Looking forward to being able to speak to Apple about it."

Jon Prosser responds to the lawsuit, hinting at his side of the story.

"I certainly did not 'plot' to access anyone's phone."

Prosser defends himself against the accusations made by Apple.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing tensions between tech companies and information leaks. Apple's aggressive stance on protecting its trade secrets illustrates its commitment to safeguarding its intellectual property. Industry experts suggest that this case may deter others from similar actions in the future. However, it also raises questions about the balance between innovation and transparency in the technology sector. The legal framework surrounding digital information is still evolving, and outcomes like this could shape future interactions between tech firms and content creators.